http://www.mikeaxelrod.com/wp/2009/01/06/the-most-overlooked-semantic-web-application-for-2008 Mike Axelrod's blog Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:21:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 http://www.mikeaxelrod.com/wp/2009/01/06/the-most-overlooked-semantic-web-application-for-2008/comment-page-1#comment-215 To Semantic Web καλπάζει, η Ελλάδα δεν χαμπαριάζει, το ΚΚΕ αρνείται το Κατύν, ενώ… η Γη τη Wikipedia κατεβάζει! « OMADEON Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:16:51 +0000 http://www.mikeaxelrod.com/wp/?p=175#comment-215 [...] The most overlooked semantic web application for 2008? (mikeaxelrod.com) [...] [...] The most overlooked semantic web application for 2008? (mikeaxelrod.com) [...]

]]> http://www.mikeaxelrod.com/wp/2009/01/06/the-most-overlooked-semantic-web-application-for-2008/comment-page-1#comment-154 Yaron Koren Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:47:33 +0000 http://www.mikeaxelrod.com/wp/?p=175#comment-154 It's true that the lack of recognition for SMW can be frustrating, although I think looking to sources like these for validation might be a dead end. So much that's been written about the Semantic Web is bullshit, and this ReadWriteWeb list is a prime example. Of the ten "Semantic Web products" they review, I think only two - SearchMonkey and OpenCalais - are actually Semantic Web products at all. The rest of them deal with tags and natural-language processing - interesting, perhaps, but not the Semantic Web: there's not a triple or a piece of queriable data in sight. I suppose you could make the case that the inclusion of SMW on such a silly list would have been a bad sign. :) It’s true that the lack of recognition for SMW can be frustrating, although I think looking to sources like these for validation might be a dead end. So much that’s been written about the Semantic Web is bullshit, and this ReadWriteWeb list is a prime example. Of the ten “Semantic Web products” they review, I think only two - SearchMonkey and OpenCalais - are actually Semantic Web products at all. The rest of them deal with tags and natural-language processing - interesting, perhaps, but not the Semantic Web: there’s not a triple or a piece of queriable data in sight. I suppose you could make the case that the inclusion of SMW on such a silly list would have been a bad sign.

]]>